data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/436f3/436f3a815a2754dfa0bc1d66300a9e3195d53a0b" alt=""
But, rather than go to old faithful, I've (re)started reading Jacques Derrida (WAH wah). I tried to read one of his books a few years ago (Archive Fever), but couldn't stay awake long enough to finish it. Seriously, it was like Sleepinol. His writing is so dense and pedantic, it's a chore to follow. The introduction for that book actually notes that he even writes in a style that makes it difficult to translate into English. What a dick! However, he is noted as the founder of the philosophy of deconstruction, which is heavily referenced by most of the important modern architects, specifically in deconstructivist work, so I figure it is worthwhile to try to understand him.
My brother made me a t-shirt with a montage of work from Lebbeus Woods's Radical Reconstruction. I fell in love with Woods's work as soon as Sean introduced me to it a couple years ago, but I had forgotten about it until that shirt arrived in the mail. Thanks, Sean!
Sean pointed out to me today that Lebbeus Woods has never been known as a deconstructivist, but, in his words (Sean's), certainly a futurist, and maybe, if you had to label him, we'd call him a post-functionalist.
Lebbeus Woods has a blog! Yes!
If I can derive anything useful in my study of Derrida, I'll be sure to post something about it.
Here's a picture of me with a disembodied light bulb hanging from a string. This whole post is really just a bunch of words surrounding this picture. It's a deconstructivist picture in a room that's been partially de-constructed... and I'm wearing a shirt that's disintegrating. Oh yeah, that t-shirt is like as old as my copy of The Portable Nietzsche. I treat it like a priceless artifact. It's sooo comfortable, it's almost as light as air, and as soft as a newly shorn lamb.
5 comments:
That shirt still exists? Holy shirt!...err......I mean shit.
It is the holiest of shirts!
Oh my lord, Derrida. Try making a word map by linking terms to each other...and see if you can come up with contextual definitions. That's the only way to make it fun. OR--read it like it's giving you advice on life, like practical philosophy, and it'll make you laugh.
I think Derrida should've only ever written one sentence, and it would say something like: Ce que veut dire une chose est contient *entre* les mots--les realtions des mots--et non pas *dans* les mots leur-memes.
I think D&G is MUCH more fun.
D&G look vastly more fascinating than Derrida. Anti-Oedipus and A Thousand Plateaus are now on the list. Thanks for the tip!
_A Thousand Plateaus_ was on my bedside table for like six years. It's AWESOME. I used to open to a page in order to "throw my sticks" in an I-Ching sorta way.
But be careful. You'll start seeing faces everywhere.
Post a Comment